Thursday, January 29, 2015
Standardized Testing and My iPhone
Today I got a notice that my iPhone system software was ready for an upgrade. And this is what the upgrade will do. Note point #5. [No, this is not a joke--the new iphone/ipad software is set up to make it easy to take "education standardized testing."]
Sunday, January 18, 2015
Today This Blog Is Five Years Old
Five years ago today I started this blog. Read why here.
Five years, two children who have graduated from the Ann Arbor schools, one more with just 2-1/2 years left, educational policy in this state that goes from bad to worse.
I'm not sure what comes next with this blog. I do know that I have a lot of other things competing for my attention, and a lot of other interests that have gone untended.
I also know that there is a huge need for attention to be paid to the schools--much more than I anticipated when I started.
In the meantime, I expect the next year to be one of discernment regarding what I should do with this blog. It might continue, more or less as, or perhaps with a focus on higher level thoughts about education. I might be looking for someone else to take it over. Is that you? Or it might just remain, as a piece of history.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Five years, two children who have graduated from the Ann Arbor schools, one more with just 2-1/2 years left, educational policy in this state that goes from bad to worse.
I'm not sure what comes next with this blog. I do know that I have a lot of other things competing for my attention, and a lot of other interests that have gone untended.
I also know that there is a huge need for attention to be paid to the schools--much more than I anticipated when I started.
In the meantime, I expect the next year to be one of discernment regarding what I should do with this blog. It might continue, more or less as, or perhaps with a focus on higher level thoughts about education. I might be looking for someone else to take it over. Is that you? Or it might just remain, as a piece of history.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Labels:
Ann Arbor,
blogging,
first thoughts
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Silence Is Assent: Je Suis Charlie #charliehebdo
Je Suis Charlie. I Am Charlie Hebdo.
Silence is assent.
The pen is mightier than the sword. I hope.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
![]() |
| A collage of Charlie Hebdo covers. Taken from Berlin's BZ paper. |
I'm posting this following the good idea of Dov Bear, who wrote:
I am urging ALL of you to do this too. Put the collage of Charlie Hebdo covers (taken from Berlin's BZ paper) on your blogs, your Facebook pages and tell your local papers you want them to take a stand and run this, too. Tell the terrorists that they don't control the public discourse or the free exchange of ideas. Tell them they aren't going to win this. We get to think. We get to talk, We get to laugh. And they can't stop us.
Silence is assent.
The pen is mightier than the sword. I hope.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Labels:
international,
politics,
religion,
satire,
terrorism
Louisiana Lesson #3: Invasive Species
One of the things we did in New Orleans was to go on a kayak trip. But first, we had to learn about the devastation of the Louisiana wetlands--how dredging and channelization, levees, oil and gas exploration, climate change and more have had a devastating impact on the Louisiana coastline. It is losing miles of land every year and is more at risk than any other part of the U.S. And that is even without hurricanes! I'm not going to go into a detailed explanation of it here--but if you are interested, this link has a nice primer.
[I'm not going to do into an explanation of why the nearly-all Republican legislators from Louisiana don't take the lead on trying to find a solution to the problem. Granted, most of them don't believe in climate change but I personally think you don't even need to believe in climate change to understand this is a problem...]
But anyway--while we were out there kayaking, we did hear about how some of the invasive species are contributing to the devastation of the wetlands.
In particular, we heard about the water hyacinth. A native of South America, it was innocently introduced as a beautiful plant for water gardens in the south at the 1884 Worlds Fair. And now it has spread, and spread--taking over wetlands throughout the south.
Having seen it, I can tell you that the Water Hyacinth is a pretty plant. It looks shiny and new.
It struck me that invasive species are a good metaphor for what happens with the schools. The idea of introducing a new species sounds good. And then it turns out that it wasn't such a great idea. In fact, that it caused a lot of new problems.
Here in Michigan we've got our own invasives to contend with--purple loosestrife, periwinkle, garlic mustard, buckthorn...(read about them here).
Testing, charters, Teach For America--to me they are all invasive species. They sounded like good ideas, but in the end, they are (as a famous story in my family goes) "not so hotsy-totsy, and not so ai-yai-yai!". In fact, they are destructive.
Louisiana is ahead of us in invasive species and wetlands loss, and ahead of us in destruction of public schools as well. But don't think that we are not catching up! And understand that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
As with the fight to get rid of invasive species, different techniques are required for different species. So too with all the "new, better" school invasions.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
[I'm not going to do into an explanation of why the nearly-all Republican legislators from Louisiana don't take the lead on trying to find a solution to the problem. Granted, most of them don't believe in climate change but I personally think you don't even need to believe in climate change to understand this is a problem...]
But anyway--while we were out there kayaking, we did hear about how some of the invasive species are contributing to the devastation of the wetlands.
In particular, we heard about the water hyacinth. A native of South America, it was innocently introduced as a beautiful plant for water gardens in the south at the 1884 Worlds Fair. And now it has spread, and spread--taking over wetlands throughout the south.
Having seen it, I can tell you that the Water Hyacinth is a pretty plant. It looks shiny and new.
It struck me that invasive species are a good metaphor for what happens with the schools. The idea of introducing a new species sounds good. And then it turns out that it wasn't such a great idea. In fact, that it caused a lot of new problems.
Here in Michigan we've got our own invasives to contend with--purple loosestrife, periwinkle, garlic mustard, buckthorn...(read about them here).
Testing, charters, Teach For America--to me they are all invasive species. They sounded like good ideas, but in the end, they are (as a famous story in my family goes) "not so hotsy-totsy, and not so ai-yai-yai!". In fact, they are destructive.
Louisiana is ahead of us in invasive species and wetlands loss, and ahead of us in destruction of public schools as well. But don't think that we are not catching up! And understand that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
As with the fight to get rid of invasive species, different techniques are required for different species. So too with all the "new, better" school invasions.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Labels:
Charters,
environment,
Louisiana
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
Louisiana Lesson #2: Charters and Choice
I spent part of my vacation in New Orleans. I didn't spend much time on the schools there (although my daughter did get me some Louisiana-themed books for Chanukah, including one on education that I have not read yet). Nonetheless, I did hear a bit about how the (nearly) all-charter New Orleans school system has negatively affected students.
Just two points:
1. One person described to me how the for-profit school charters are trying to decrease their costs--and the way that they are doing it is to make class sizes larger. And the initial reason for charters? Supposedly they were going to make class sizes smaller...
[You might want to read this Diane Ravitch post with important links demonstrating why class size really does matter. In fact, the needier the kids, the more it matters...]
2. I visited with an old friend of mine who was visiting her family in New Orleans. She is a teacher in Florida now. She described to me how in New Orleans today, you put in your requests to schools to a central administrative body who decides what schools your kids will go to. One of her relatives has three elementary-school-age children, and each of them is in a different school. That is not his choice. I immediately thought, "getting kids to school must be a nightmare!" But that's not what she pointed out to me. She pointed out that the system is completely disempowering to parents.
The great irony, of course, is that the whole "promotional" idea behind charter schools is that parents should have choice.
But now, the last laugh is on New Orleans parents.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Just two points:
1. One person described to me how the for-profit school charters are trying to decrease their costs--and the way that they are doing it is to make class sizes larger. And the initial reason for charters? Supposedly they were going to make class sizes smaller...
[You might want to read this Diane Ravitch post with important links demonstrating why class size really does matter. In fact, the needier the kids, the more it matters...]
![]() |
| New Orleans school district. Screen shot taken from Google 1/4/2014. |
2. I visited with an old friend of mine who was visiting her family in New Orleans. She is a teacher in Florida now. She described to me how in New Orleans today, you put in your requests to schools to a central administrative body who decides what schools your kids will go to. One of her relatives has three elementary-school-age children, and each of them is in a different school. That is not his choice. I immediately thought, "getting kids to school must be a nightmare!" But that's not what she pointed out to me. She pointed out that the system is completely disempowering to parents.
The great irony, of course, is that the whole "promotional" idea behind charter schools is that parents should have choice.
But now, the last laugh is on New Orleans parents.
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Labels:
Charters,
for-profit,
Louisiana,
parents
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Louisiana Lesson #1: Plessy v Ferguson
I spent part of my winter break in New Orleans. And during a cemetery tour, I saw the grave of Homer Plessy.
Plessy, as in the famous "Separate but Equal" 1896 Supreme Court case of Plessy v. Ferguson.
What I didn't know is that the Plessy v. Ferguson case, which was applied to schools until the case of Brown v. Board of Education, did not start out as an education case. It was a case about separate transportation on street cars. It was a transportation case (think Rosa Parks), but its impact was felt on education.
![]() |
| The family grave, which includes Homer Plessy, and is in French, says that Homer Plessy died March 1, 1925, age 63. Photo by Ruth Kraut |
From oyez.org:
Facts of the Case[Editors note: Back then, Plessy was described as an "octroon," since he was only 1/8 black. I always loved the sound of that word, though not what it connotes--that someone with only a single drop of blood ascribed to a black ancestor would be considered black.]
The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy--who was seven-eighths Caucasian--took a seat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested.
Question
Is Louisiana's law mandating racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusion
Decision: 7 votes for Ferguson, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: US Const. Amend 14, Section 1
No, the state law is within constitutional boundaries. The majority, in an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, upheld state-imposed racial segregation. The justices based their decision on the separate-but-equal doctrine, that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal. (The phrase, "separate but equal" was not part of the opinion.) Justice Brown conceded that the 14th amendment intended to establish absolute equality for the races before the law. But Brown noted that "in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality, or a commingling of the two races unsatisfactory to either." In short, segregation does not in itself constitute unlawful discrimination.
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Keep the Pressure on Legislators!
It's a fast changing universe with lame duck session. Two groups that are following the details: Michigan Parents for Schools and the Tri-County Alliance for Education. Here is the latest update from MIPFS.
Final hours of lame duck - your voice needed now!
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Final hours of lame duck - your voice needed now!
Dear Ruth,
The lame duck session of the legislature is drawing to a close, and two important measures that would hurt our local schools are still under intense discussion. We've reached the point where we need you to call your legislators personally.
The first measure, as you know, is funding for roads: while the state Senate opted to simply raise money directly with the gas tax, the House was afraid of raising any taxes and chose to take road funds from money that normally goes to schools as well as cities and towns. They have been negotiating over this for many days now, and as the deadline nears, the pressure to do something - anything - will grow.
Whatever solution they find must not remove funding from schools, period. Simply leave our kids out of it.
The second measure is the school district "deficit early warning" package, or, as we like to call it, the "Defund 'Em + Take 'Em Over" package. These bills do nothing to help local schools in financial trouble but do greatly expand the power of the stateTreasury Department to take over districts with budget problems. While the state bleeds funding from our schools, these bills would require districts to dedicate staff to write a whole slew of new reports to describe how they are in financial trouble. Bill sponsors weren't interested in the concerns of parents or school officials and pushed their punitive bills through the Senate. They may come up for a vote in the House today.
We really need you to call TODAY. Ask your lawmakers to:
- Fix the roads, but leave our kids and schools out of it. (HB 4539, 5477, 5493)
- Oppose the "Defund 'Em + Take 'Em Over" package (SB 951-954, 957)
Please CALL
Rep. Adam Zemke - (517) 373-1792
Sen. Rebekah Warren - (517) 373-2406
Thank you for your efforts to protect our local schools!
Steve Norton
Michigan Parents for Schools
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Legislative Whack-a-Mole: Lame Duck Session Activities
I am reposting this alert from Michigan Parents for Schools, written by Steve Norton, which sums up all the problems with this lame duck session and suggests some action.
Steve Norton
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Let's play "Legislative Whack-A-Mole™"!
We're in the legislative "lame duck" session, so that means it must be time to push a lot of bad ideas into law while Michigan voters are getting ready for the holidays. And we have a great assortment of bad ideas this year:
Bad Idea #1 - Let's pave the roads with our children's education:
Everyone agrees that our roads need help. The MI Senate passed a straight-up increase in the gas tax to pay for it. But in their continuing effort to duck responsibility for, well, anything, the state House leadership breathed new life into a discredited plan to pay for better roads with - you guessed it - money from schools. To the tune of $700 million per year - $500 per student. And then "We the People" would have to vote on a referendum to raise taxes just to keep the school funding we already have. Sweet!
This is utter nonsense and displays not courage but the exact opposite. Read news coverage here and here and then use our advocacy system to let your Representative know what you think of this plan (use this link:http://www.capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=62630721).
Bad Idea #2 - Cut school funding and then take 'em over when they have budget problems:The "deficit early warning" bill package sailed through the Senate and now has to gain the approval of the House. It has not improved with age. Here is our write-up on the bills; please use our action alert here to contact the Governor and House members - http://www.capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=63971481
Bad Idea #3 - Cut school funding and then force them to flunk 3rd graders who don't test well in reading: We do need to make sure that every child can read well, and as early as possible. But that's not always easy, and helping kids who struggle with reading can't be done on the cheap. Simply branding kids (and schools) as failures by flunking them after 3rd grade won't make the challenges go away. Even Florida, supposedly a success story for this flunking idea, only made real improvements by investing hundreds of millions of dollars in early reading intervention programs. The Michigan version? Not a dime.
Read our issue brief here, and then speak out on this proposal to your State Representative with this link:http://www.capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=63971576!
Bad Idea #4 - Cut school funding, and then slap a simplistic letter grade on them to show how badly they're doing: In Lansing and in Washington, there is a fetish about judging schools on the basis of a handful of test scores. This proposal would make things worse by using narrow test scores to "grade" schools - on a curve, no less. Does a grade of "C" make you think "pretty decent, middle of the pack'? Me neither. And how about that big red "F" (they really want to be able to Fail schools) - does that make you think "schools struggling with a history of poverty, discrimination and instability"? Not exactly. But this bill would make sure that schools with the lowest test scores always got an F.
Trying to sum up a school's performance in one letter grade, based on scores from tests we haven't even picked yet, is not a solution. It's just shifting the blame, and rewarding schools that care about nothing but test scores.Read our issue brief here, and then speak out on this proposal to your State Representative by using this link:http://capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=63971636!
(You may have noticed a common theme: cut school funding, and then make a fuss about how public schools can't "do their jobs." Like a good magician, make sure your audience is only looking at what you want them to see.)
What can you do? Pick the ones that disgust you the most and make your voice heard. If you're like me, that will be all of these bad ideas. The folks behind these bills are hoping no one is watching; they are hoping to keep us looking in the wrong direction. Let's show them that we see through their magic tricks. Take action today!
Bad Idea #1 - Let's pave the roads with our children's education:
Everyone agrees that our roads need help. The MI Senate passed a straight-up increase in the gas tax to pay for it. But in their continuing effort to duck responsibility for, well, anything, the state House leadership breathed new life into a discredited plan to pay for better roads with - you guessed it - money from schools. To the tune of $700 million per year - $500 per student. And then "We the People" would have to vote on a referendum to raise taxes just to keep the school funding we already have. Sweet!
This is utter nonsense and displays not courage but the exact opposite. Read news coverage here and here and then use our advocacy system to let your Representative know what you think of this plan (use this link:http://www.capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=62630721).
Bad Idea #2 - Cut school funding and then take 'em over when they have budget problems:The "deficit early warning" bill package sailed through the Senate and now has to gain the approval of the House. It has not improved with age. Here is our write-up on the bills; please use our action alert here to contact the Governor and House members - http://www.capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=63971481
Bad Idea #3 - Cut school funding and then force them to flunk 3rd graders who don't test well in reading: We do need to make sure that every child can read well, and as early as possible. But that's not always easy, and helping kids who struggle with reading can't be done on the cheap. Simply branding kids (and schools) as failures by flunking them after 3rd grade won't make the challenges go away. Even Florida, supposedly a success story for this flunking idea, only made real improvements by investing hundreds of millions of dollars in early reading intervention programs. The Michigan version? Not a dime.
Read our issue brief here, and then speak out on this proposal to your State Representative with this link:http://www.capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=63971576!
Bad Idea #4 - Cut school funding, and then slap a simplistic letter grade on them to show how badly they're doing: In Lansing and in Washington, there is a fetish about judging schools on the basis of a handful of test scores. This proposal would make things worse by using narrow test scores to "grade" schools - on a curve, no less. Does a grade of "C" make you think "pretty decent, middle of the pack'? Me neither. And how about that big red "F" (they really want to be able to Fail schools) - does that make you think "schools struggling with a history of poverty, discrimination and instability"? Not exactly. But this bill would make sure that schools with the lowest test scores always got an F.
Trying to sum up a school's performance in one letter grade, based on scores from tests we haven't even picked yet, is not a solution. It's just shifting the blame, and rewarding schools that care about nothing but test scores.Read our issue brief here, and then speak out on this proposal to your State Representative by using this link:http://capwiz.com/miparentsforschools/issues/alert/?alertid=63971636!
(You may have noticed a common theme: cut school funding, and then make a fuss about how public schools can't "do their jobs." Like a good magician, make sure your audience is only looking at what you want them to see.)
What can you do? Pick the ones that disgust you the most and make your voice heard. If you're like me, that will be all of these bad ideas. The folks behind these bills are hoping no one is watching; they are hoping to keep us looking in the wrong direction. Let's show them that we see through their magic tricks. Take action today!
Steve Norton
MI Parents for Schools
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Monday, December 1, 2014
Jazzing Up the Singapore Delegation's Visit. Also, Cool Libraries.
Two weeks ago on Wednesday night there was a reception before the school board meeting for the delegation from Singapore. (You may recall that Ann Arbor sent a delegation to Singapore over the summer. Jenna Bacolor reported on it in her Rec & Ed blog.) You might also recall that I did a blog exchange with a blogger from Singapore. Read her post on my blog here.
![]() |
| The delegation from Singapore. There is another person hiding behind the person on the far left. Photo by Ruth Kraut. |
To be perfectly honest, what brought me to the pre-school board meeting was not the prospect of seeing the Singapore delegation in action, or the prospect of hours of listening to people talking, but rather, the fact that the Community High Jazz Band (at least, one of its combos) was performing for the Singapore delegation reception. As it happens, this is the combo that I am most interested in, because my son is the drummer. And also--drum sets do not transport themselves. (To be fair, my husband was there too and drove there.)
![]() |
| All of the photos are by me. I know, they are not necessarily the best! It probably would help if I didn't move the iphone while pressing the camera button. |
![]() |
| Left to right: Lucas Atkin-Smith, Lydia Kreinke, Liam Knight, Jonathan Lynn, Raven Eaddy. Photo by Ruth Kraut |
![]() |
| Left to right: Lucas Atkin-Smith, Jonathan Lynn, Raven Eaddy, Joel Appel-Kraut |
![]() |
| Check out the wonderful drummer! Photo by Ruth Kraut. |
Also, the CHS Jazz Band teacher, Jack Wagner, was there with his two children--who were happily dancing to the jazz music. I danced with them a bit as well. They told me that they do, in fact, listen to (and like) lots of other music. One of their favorites? Lady Gaga.
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
AAPS School Climate Data: A Teacher's Perspective on the Teachers' Perspectives
A guest post from A3 Teacher
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
In June of this year Ann Arbor Public Schools released their school climate data from the 2013-14 school year. The results from the surveys given to students, parents/guardians, and teachers can all be found here. As a teacher I was particularly interested in the teacher survey. Four items stood out to me as possible areas for AAPS improvement--at the bottom of this post are the full details of the items selected for this post (Most of these items are briefly touched upon in the presentation given at the AAPS Board Meeting, although the presentation lacked specifics in regard to ways of addressing them). Having worked in other school districts that do extremely well in these areas, I know that AAPS can, and should, do better. It will be interesting to see the results of the next climate survey in order to determine if the district has improved in these areas.
1. 39% of teachers feel that professional development did not help them to better meet the learning needs of students.
If almost 40% of teachers feel that current professional development does not ultimately help students to learn and achieve at higher levels, there may be larger problems. While there will most likely continue to be serious budget issues in Michigan’s future, high quality professional development does not necessarily cost more. The key to highly successful professional development is 1) surveying teachers needs and desires, 2) finding the intersection and linking these items to the school improvement plan, and 3) putting plenty of time towards planning, execution, and follow-up. How is administration reflecting or gathering data in order to evaluate the effectiveness of professional development? Administrators and directors must invest the time and employ best practices in order to raise the use and efficacy of professional development. Perhaps each administrator could survey building teachers using an online format and build these targeted needs into professional development.
2. 45% of teachers feel that their schools are not kept clean.
The second area that is in our control is the cleanliness of schools. We have now made a contract with GCA services. The district, hopefully, is collecting or will be collecting data on 1) whether schools are cleaner or dirtier as a result of this contract, 2) what services have been gained and/or lost because of the contract (for example, are desks and surfaces cleaned? What are the exact expectations that parents, students, and teachers should see met in regard to the cleaning of each space where, many times, hundreds of students pass through?). Should this contract prove to not increase cleanliness, the district should consider alternatives in the upcoming year.
In addition, perhaps AAPS and GCA could partner to create an online spreadsheet that would allow teachers, parents, and students to report areas of concern in their schools. Taking that idea a step further, perhaps GCA or AAPS could develop an app to allow students, parents, and teachers to upload photos from smart devices in order to report areas of concern. [Editor’s Note: The City of Ann Arbor recently developed an app so that citizens can identify and submit problems such as potholes.] Separately, perhaps GCA could send a survey each quarter in order to determine areas of success and areas to continue working on. By state law teachers must demonstrate growth of their students. Shouldn’t we also expect GCA to show that they are increasing the cleanliness of the schools?
3. 30% of teachers do not feel like they have the materials needed to be effective in teaching.
As teachers are told to do more and more (more students in each classroom, more development of curriculum, assessments, and implementation of new programs), I find it disheartening that teachers do not feel that they have the items needed to be successful. It is challenging when paperbacks are literally falling apart in students’ hands, when science teachers do not have enough lab equipment to run the types of labs they know are important to student learning, or teachers lack the necessary materials to engage all students in art projects. There is a gap between what teachers know must happen in the classroom in order for significant growth and learning and the financial realities of Michigan’s current state of education.
This year the Ann Arbor Educational Foundation pledged an additional amount (up to $80,000 from the previous year’s $22,000) to provide AAPS schools with grants for projects. This can partially fill in the gaps in order to give teachers the necessary tools to be and feel successful; AAPS should increase teachers’ access to and understanding of the grants. I would recommend that the AAEF consider two application dates (one in the fall and one in the spring) as opposed to one giant singular date in the fall. This would allow teachers to plan during the summer, knowing that they can count on specific tools or items in the coming school year.
4. 55% of teachers do not consider their schools well-maintained in regard to a comfortable climate, lighting, and grounds.
School maintenance continues to be an area in which AAPS struggles. When asked the same question, 37% of 6-12 students felt the same as the teachers. While this is not only an issue of providing employees with an appropriate and professional workspace, it is also an issue of creating environments that are conducive to learning. The district must figure out how to address these issues - perhaps creating a volunteer corps of teachers, families, students, and community members to work together on these items would be beneficial.
Strongly Disagree
|
Disagree
|
Agree
|
Strongly Agree
|
Don't Know
|
Total Responses
| |
The professional development sessions I have attended have helped me to better meet the learning needs of my students.
|
10%
|
29%
|
41%
|
17%
|
3%
|
726
|
Fresh, high-quality food is served at this school.
|
10%
|
25%
|
33%
|
7%
|
25%
|
723
|
My school is kept clean.
|
19%
|
26%
|
41%
|
13%
|
1%
|
726
|
I have the materials I need -- such as textbooks, computers and visual aids -- to effectively teach my classes.
|
6%
|
24%
|
51%
|
16%
|
3%
|
720
|
This school is well-maintained, with a comfortable climate, adequate lighting and well-kept grounds.
|
19%
|
36%
|
35%
|
10%
|
0%
|
728
|
Consider subscribing to Ann Arbor Schools Musings by Email!
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Rick DeKeon Rec & Ed Run: Everyone Is A Winner
Rick DeKeon was a well-loved Northside Elementary physical education teacher who died last year. In his memory, Ann Arbor Rec & Ed decided to hold a 5K run, with the proceeds going to raise scholarship funds for Rec & Ed activities.
I got my son Joel to run with me! (Well, not really with me. He's much faster than me--but he did join me at the 5K.)
The whole thing sounded like a great idea when we signed up on a warm fall day. A few weeks later...brrr!
I got my son Joel to run with me! (Well, not really with me. He's much faster than me--but he did join me at the 5K.)
The whole thing sounded like a great idea when we signed up on a warm fall day. A few weeks later...brrr!
![]() |
| Here we are with our medals. It was cold out! We didn't hang around to chat! Photo by unknown runner. |
![]() |
| Here I am with Rec & Ed Director Jenna Bacolor, right after I finished. I know! My hair! (I should have kept the hat on...) Photo by Madeline Bacolor. |
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Congratulations New Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti School Board Members
![]() |
| Photo by Ruth Kraut |
Current Ann Arbor school board members Baskett and Stead have won re-election. Joining them will be long-time school volunteer Donna Lasinski and former Ann Arbor teacher and principal Pat Manley.
![]() |
| Photo by Ruth Kraut |
| Ann Arbor Sch Brd Member | View Precinct Detail | |||
| Susan Baskett | 13780 | 3336 | 17116 | 15.01% |
| Jeffery Harrold | 7628 | 2017 | 9645 | 8.46% |
| Donna Lasinski | 13113 | 2675 | 15788 | 13.85% |
| Patricia Ashford Man | 10921 | 2927 | 13848 | 12.14% |
| Jack Panitch | 6170 | 1614 | 7784 | 6.83% |
| Deirdre Piper | 5258 | 1092 | 6350 | 5.57% |
| Christine Stead | 12176 | 2762 | 14938 | 13.10% |
| Hunter Van Valkenbur | 9365 | 2478 | 11843 | 10.39% |
| Don Wilkerson | 6485 | 1424 | 7909 | 6.94% |
| Roland Zullo | 6643 | 1537 | 8180 | 7.17% |
| Write-In | 586 | 39 | 625 | 0.55% |
![]() |
| Photo by Ruth Kraut |
One of the very interesting results to me here is that Deirdre Piper--who decided not to continue her campaign after she suddenly lost her mom in September--drew nearly 5.6% of the vote--only a little bit less than Jack Panitch and Don Wilkerson, both of whom I saw on the campaign trail.
I am so thankful that we had so many good candidates to choose from. Considering that school board pays almost nothing, sucks up a lot of time, and you often get criticism, if you see a candidate who ran and won, congratulate them. If you see a candidate who ran and lost--thank them for being willing to put themselves forward!
First Election for Ypsilanti Community Schools Board Has Interesting Results
Remember, the YCS is the result of the merger of the Ypsilanti and Willow Run schools, and the first Ypsilanti Community Schools Board was appointed, not elected. It is great that so many people wanted to run for school board. Only a couple of the incumbents got re-elected.
Again, unofficial results from the county elections web site.
For the six-year terms:
| Ypsilanti Comm Sch Bd 6yr | View Precinct Detail | |||
| Bill Kurkjian | 1923 | 724 | 2647 | 14.54% |
| Brenda Meadows | 4423 | 1492 | 5915 | 32.49% |
| Gregory Myers | 2642 | 1050 | 3692 | 20.28% |
| Maria Sheler-Edwards | 4301 | 1468 | 5769 | 31.69% |
| Write-In | 156 | 24 | 180 | 0.99% |
Maria Sheler-Edwards is an incumbent; Brenda Meadows is not.
For the four-year terms:
| Ypsilanti Comm Sch Bd 4yr | View Precinct Detail | |||
| David R. Bates | 2417 | 1106 | 3523 | 12.98% |
| Ellen Champagne | 2816 | 927 | 3743 | 13.79% |
| Djeneba Cherif | 2238 | 604 | 2842 | 10.47% |
| Celeste Hawkins | 3272 | 1130 | 4402 | 16.22% |
| Sharon Irvine | 3235 | 1188 | 4423 | 16.30% |
| Linda Snedacar-Horne | 1820 | 671 | 2491 | 9.18% |
| Anthony VanDerworp | 1488 | 673 | 2161 | 7.96% |
| Mark Wilde | 2456 | 889 | 3345 | 12.32% |
| Write-In | 186 | 27 | 213 | 0.78% |
Celeste Hawkins is an incumbent--the other two are not. Sharon Irvine is a former Ypsilanti Public Schools administrator (and candidate for superintendent). David Bates, the Board President, and former Ypsilanti Public Schools board president, will not retain his seat. I'll admit to some surprise that newcomer Djeneba Cherif, a former YPS student who said she was inspired by her Ypsilanti teachers to go into education, did not win a seat. Everyone whom I asked in Ypsilanti was planning on voting for her--which maybe just goes to show you what a myopic view we each have as individuals.
| Ypsilanti Comm Sch Bd 2yr | View Precinct Detail | |||
| Don L. Garrett Jr. | 2209 | 920 | 3129 | 16.99% |
| Ricky Jefferson | 1840 | 639 | 2479 | 13.46% |
| Sharon Lee | 3141 | 953 | 4094 | 22.23% |
| K.J. Miller | 1524 | 520 | 2044 | 11.10% |
| Daniel L. Raglin | 1507 | 748 | 2255 | 12.24% |
| Meredith Schindler | 3187 | 1073 | 4260 | 23.13% |
| Write-In | 137 | 22 | 159 | 0.86% |
Meredith Schindler and Sharon Lee got elected. Neither are incumbents. Where this gets interesting is that Sharon Lee had withdrawn from the race due to health issues after the ballots were printed. Which means she won with zero campaigning. So I guess that now she has to decide if she really is withdrawing. If she does, she resigns and the board then follows the procedure for choosing a school board candidate after a resignation. So it won't automatically go to the third-place two-year candidate.
Whitmore Lake Annexation lost in Ann Arbor, won in Whitmore Lake, which means that it lost overall
Am I disappointed? Yes. But I'm not surprised. The ballot language was terrible and there were lots of unanswered questions.
Onward!
[And that's enough blogging for a month of Sundays! Expect things to be quite a bit quieter around here now!]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















